 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Laurie Axford on Are Diagnostic Method Claims Patentable?:New Rulings Raise Old Questions
LEXISNEXIS® Emerging Issues Analysis
June 2010
H. David Starr and Gregory Bennett on Alibaba and the Forty Thousand Thieves: Combating Counterfeiting on B2B Websites
LEXISNEXIS® Emerging Issues Analysis
May 2010
Intellectual Property and the Web
By H. David Starr
Presented to the DC Web Women (DCWW)
Alexandria, VA
March 30, 2010
Brian S. Sun and Laurie A. Axford on Wyeth v. Kappos and the ABCs of Patent Term Adjustment
LEXISNEXIS® Emerging Issues Analysis
March 2010
How to Protect (and Profit from) Your Intellectual Property Assets
By Joshua B. Goldberg and H. David Starr
Presented to the YES!Circle
Alexandria, VA
October 20, 2009
The Legal Side of Branding: Legal Considerations in Adopting and Selecting a Trademark
By H. David Starr
Presented to the American Marketing Association — DC Chapter
Washington, DC
August 6, 2009
Negotiating International Partnerships and Alliances
By Ross A. Epstein
Presented to the Middle East Entrepreneur Training Alumni Conference (MEET) — Presented by the
Entrepreneur Development Program at the Rady School of Management, UC San Diego
Istanbul, Turkey
August 4, 2009
Trademark Protection of Color Marks in the United States
By H. David Starr and Gregory G. Bennett
China IP Magazine
June 2009 (Issue 30)
American Intellectual Property Law Association – Chemical Practice Committee Judicial and Administrative Decision Subcommittee Report: Recent Chemical, Biotechnological, and Medical Device Decisions
By Joshua B. Goldberg, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co., 560 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
Prepared for the AIPLA Spring Meeting
San Diego, CA
May 13 – 15, 2009
Legal Perspective: Launching and Protecting your Trademark
By David Starr
Toast — A Studio Spear Journal for Brand Leadership (Volume 8, Issue 2)
April 2009
Laurie Axford on Tafas v. Doll
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5806 (March 20, 2009)
LEXISNEXIS® Emerging Issues Analysis
April 2009
Color of Law? College Colors Held Protectable as Trademark
By H. David Starr and Gregory G. Bennett
NLG University Practice Group
December, 2008
Looking Forward: Gary Nath on the IP law firm of the future
IP Review - Cover Story
Issue 21
Winter 2007/8
Intellectual Property for the Startup Company
By Rob Cogan
Presented to the Rady School of Management
San Diego, CA
January 30, 2008
- Analysis of Recent Intellectual Property Decisions
-
- An Inherent Characteristic of a Disclosed Component Will Not Necessarily Support Claiming the Characteristic: In Re Lew
- PTO Admonished for Inconsistent Federal Rules Interpretation: In Re Garner
- Surrender of Claim That Leaves Invention Inoperable is Not "Clear and Unmistakable" Surrender: Elbex Video, Ltd. V. Sensormatic Electronics Corp.
- CAFC Limits a Patent Claim Based on That Which is Disclosed in the Specification: Steve Stumbo v. Eastman Outdoors, Inc.
-
By Mihsuhn Koh
Continuing Legal Education Program
Presented January 8, 2008 to The Nath Law Group
Legal Protection of Product Design in the United States
By H. David Starr
Translated by Hideyuki Fukuda, Patent Attorney, Fukuda & Associates
Journal of the Japanese Group of the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property ("A.I.P.P.I")
(or just "Journal of the Japanese Group, A.I.P.P.I")
Volume 52 No. 10, page 16
October, 2007
Click here for the Japanese Translation
Academic Technology Transfer and Technology Evaluation in the United States
By Lee C. Heiman, AUTM Vice President for Affiliates, at the
Joint U.S. Chamber of Commerce/U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Conference on Innovation and Intellectual Property Asset Evaluation
For the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China
Washington, D.C.
September 13, 2007
High Tech Contracting - Getting What You Pay For, Getting Paid for What You Do
By Rob Cogan
Presented to the Consultants' Network of San Diego
San Diego, CA
September 10, 2007
- Analysis of Recent Intellectual Property Decisions
-
- Courts Are Finding More Pharmaceuticals Obvious: Pfizer v. Apotex
- High Costs for Violating a Technology Agreement: Monsanto Company v. Homan McFarling
- As Patent Portfolios Grow, So Do Risks : McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. Bridge Medical, Inc.
- Patents That Overlap Can Cause Big Headaches For Clients: AstraZeneca v. KV Pharmaceutical Co. et al
-
By Charles Niebylski
Continuing Legal Education Program
Presented August 14, 2007 to The Nath Law Group
Doing Business in the U.S.: The Basics
Presentation Handout
By Ross A. Epstein at the
Export Club
Budapest, Hungary
July 3, 2007
KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. et al
Continuing Legal Education Program
by Lee C. Heiman, Esq.
Presented May 30, 2007 to The Nath Law Group
Life Sciences & High Tech Licensing: Who, What, Where & How
IP/Licensing Information
By Ross A. Epstein at the
Connect Entrepreneur Frameworks Workshop
San Diego California
April 3, 2007
Biotechnology Licensing: Recent IP Developments and Challenges
By Charles Niebylski at the
The Connect Workshop
San Diego, California
April 2, 2007
Internet 2.0
Intellectual Property Implications
By Ross A. Epstein at the
ComNexus Intellectual Property Special Interest Group
San Diego, California
March 21, 2007
Deal Killers in Healthcare and Biotech Licensing
by Gary M. Nath at the
Winter 2007 Meeting
Licensing Executives Society (U.S. and Canada), Inc.
February 22, 2007
Royal University of Law and Economics
and Handong International Law School Conference on Intellectual Property in Phnom Penh, Cambodia - Day 1
by Harold L. Novick
Phnom Penh, Cambodia
January 22 and 27, 2007
Royal University of Law and Economics and Handong International Law School Conference on Intellectual Property in Phnom Penh, Cambodia - Day 2
by Harold L. Novick
Phnom Penh, Cambodia
January 22 and 27, 2007
Washington DC Area
112 S. West Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
T| 703.548.NATH (6284)
F| 703.683.8396
San Diego Area
2794 Gateway Road
Carlsbad, CA 92009
T| 858.792.8211
F| 858.792.8946